Does Personal Injury Lawyer London Handle Medical Malpractice Lawsuits?
To be successful in a medical malpractice lawsuit, it is crucial to understand the legal process and the basic concepts of the case. This multi-step process starts with a client filing a claim with their medical provider, then going through a discovery process that can last for years if not decades, and culminates with a trial.
For most people, medical malpractice cases end in a settlement or a defense verdict after a jury hears from both sides at trial. In some cases, however, plaintiffs can prove negligence by obtaining an expert or two who can testify about the doctor or hospital's misconduct. This type of evidence will bolster the plaintiff's case and increase the number of damages awarded in their favor.
In some instances, plaintiffs can win big - but they're not familiar. It's more likely that you'll read about cases where plaintiffs get nothing after losing at trial. In addition, some settlements and verdicts may be out of your control; such as whether or not your doctor had malpractice insurance. This is why it's crucial to hire a Personal Injury Lawyer in London and be prepared to handle any potential outcome when filing suit against your health care provider.
A patient must first file suit with their health care provider. This initial step is necessary because unless you file a lawsuit before your health care provider has time to investigate your case and prepare its defense. Therefore, it is unlikely that you will be able to submit evidence of wrongdoing at trial.
Personal Injury Lawyer in London knows that many factors influence the outcomes of medical malpractice lawsuits, but a few stand out in particular:
• Defendants with less money
Money is a significant factor in medical malpractice cases. If a plaintiff can show that their injuries wouldn't have been as severe had the defendant not been negligent, then it's easier for plaintiffs to win at trial. A jury that was given evidence from a wealthier defendant might be inclined to find a rich defendant more blameworthy than a poorer one.
• Different claims
Even if a plaintiff's injuries weren't caused by malpractice, they might have been caused by something else - maybe a fall or an illness, for example. If so, the jury might decide that the actual cause of the injury wasn't worth blaming on the doctor and award damages based on the plaintiff's pain and suffering instead.
• Selection Of Right Attorney